Most RAG demos look fine until the model answers from training memory instead of your documents. This baseline keeps it honest.
sonnet3 daysPineconeOpenAILangChainPython
Claude
64ROI
84Scale
$1.8k88Saved
ROI for
README.md
Why this subagent
Most RAG demos look fine until the model answers from training memory instead of your documents. This baseline keeps it honest.
Documents are chunked and embedded into a Pinecone namespace; each question pulls the closest chunks, and the model answers only from those. Every answer cites the chunks it used, and when nothing relevant comes back, it says so instead of inventing one. A clean starting point you can extend.
How it runs
Used at step 01 to kick off the pipeline.
Write
Used at step 01 to kick off the pipeline.
WebFetch
Used at step 01 to kick off the pipeline.
WebSearch
Used at step 01 to kick off the pipeline.
Embed the incoming question and pull the top matching chunks from that namespace.
pending
Pass the retrieved chunks as context and have the model answer only from what was retrieved.
pending
Return the answer with the source chunk IDs it used so claims can be checked.
pending
Sample output
json
// Sample output
// (generated when the pipeline finishes)
Answer questions from Pinecone-retrieved chunks only, citing the chunk IDs used and refusing when context is missing.
Unlock the rest
The full agent definition, install snippet, and starter task are gated for community members.
Members get the full `.md` agent file, the npm / pnpm install one-liners, a starter prompt that we've tuned against real runs, and the open-source repo when this automation ships there. One email, magic link, done.